A call for better writing on the internet.
The internet has dumbed down the written word. It’s not a good thing. Consider this as a call to action to sharpen your writing skills.
As Ernest Hemingway, one of the leanest and meanest writers of the 20th Century once said, write the best line that you can, and then rewrite it, and rewrite it again.
I’ll come back to Hemingway later.
Accuracy was the first casualty of speed on the internet.
Brands and media race to be the first to share a story.
The European Referendum in the UK, and the upcoming US Presidential election show that emotion has replaced truth as the quality threshold for argument.
While we race to share information and news online, when it comes to creating content we’ve limited respect for traditional workflow.
Growing up in a newsroom taught me the discipline of filing copy on a deadline.
Subeditors, editors, printers and the distribution supply chain were dependent on you hitting your deadline. Nothing would hold the presses.
Few people respect deadlines on the internet. A colleague working on a crowdsourced book with a six week lead in reported this week that more than half the content was late.
You either need to create false deadlines or build slack into your schedule.
Newsroom discipline used to mean that stories that weren’t deemed worthy of print were spiked.
There’s no word or page limit on the internet. You can post as much as you write. Web pages soak up copy.
News discipline has been replaced by the dynamics of search and social.
We’ve swapped reportage for Buzzfeed style lists and cats doing daft things, in a bid to bait search engines and newsfeeds.
Writing is much more than chucking words down on a screen. What, why, when, how, where, and who, are the six tenets of reporting from Kipling’s I Keep Six Honest Serving Men.
News stories should start with a lead in, and follow this structure. Facts and quotes are added for colour.
It’s a faithful format that means a story can be told in 200 or 400 words.
A benefit of this approach is that you can shorten articles without losing meaning, by cutting paragraphs from the bottom.
The format also works for longer form, allowing for argument, discussion and examples.
When your currency is as many words as will fit on a printed page, the skills of a subeditor are critical to refine and tighten copy.
Third party opinion and scrutiny will always land your work in a better place.
It’s a means of catching basic errors; tightening language through nips and tucks; and catching errors.
The internet is slowly adopting American English.
I blame a generation of writers weaned on word processor applications. I’m guilty myself.
There are two schools of thought: write for your largest public, in my case US citizens, or write in your native style. I’ve landed on the latter.
Back to Hemingway. I recommend the tool of the same name, spotlighted in #PRStack, as a writing coach.
You can either write directly into the app, or cut and paste your copy when you’re done.
Hemingway will highlight sloppy copy and help tighten up your writing. I recommend it as a tool for anyone who wants to be taken seriously as a writer.
Thanks to Julian Christopher, Judy Gombita, and Sarah Hall and for comments and inspiration via Twitter.
Thanks for stopping by. If you enjoyed this blog post you may like to receive future posts as they are published, via email. Please sign-up here.